1/24 必読記事・論考(IT)

ITトレンド

TechDirt 1/24/05 A Global Game Of Telephone Invents The Google Telephone Network (噂の伝播について)
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050124/0141254_F.shtml
(関連) Insied Google 1/24/05 Google Phone?
http://google.blognewschannel.com/index.php/archives/2005/01/24/google-phone/
seattlepi.com 1/24/05 Analyzing Amazon
http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/buzz/archives/004196.html
Wired 1/24/05 Gambling Sites Hedging Bets
http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,66358,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
A VC 1/23/05 Blogging Benefits
http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2005/01/blogging_benefi.html
PEW 1/23/05 Search Engine Users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting – but they are also unaware and naïve
http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/146/report_display.asp
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Searchengine_users.pdf
Ross Mayfield 1/23/05 Cornucopia of Cooperation and Social Spillover
http://ross.typepad.com/blog/2005/01/cornucopia_of_c.html

What do Napster and Wikipedia have in common? Both had or have rapid growth with value created by users. But what's fascinating is how this value was generated from personal and social incentives.

Om Malik 1/21/05 Metcalfe’s Law, Meet Market Reality,
http://www.gigaom.com/2005/01/21/metcalfes-law-meet-market-reality/

Back in the day he said that usefulness, or utility of a network equals the square of the number of users. This became known as the Metcalfe’s Law, and has been the bedrock of this crazy ever growing organism called the Internet. As a theorem when applied to the network economics, it proved to be a be a good barometer of success of a technology, or a product or a service.
However, Metcalfe’s Law has never been tested in a situation where the network slows to grow - after all the Internet use is still growing.

JOHO the Blog 1/22/05 Friday: The things I want to say
http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/003601.html

I don't blame the media folks who reacted negatively. First, it's a human reaction. But more important, I think it's a sign of the cognitive gap between us; we've made progress in understanding one another, but we're now at the point where the misunderstandings are so deep that they're easier to ignore than to confront.
So, here's the cognitive gap that I see: The media folks (generalizing) still think that the important effect that blogging is having on them — and they do believe it's having an effect — comes from bloggers who are sorta kinda journalists. But that's a tiny percentage of the blogosphere. The truly disruptive effect of bloggers comes from the rest of the blogosphere that doesn't think of itself as journalistic at all. We're not the farm team for Big Media. We're a different ballpark entirely.

Blogarithm 1/21/05 A Successor to MP3?
http://www.rds.com/blogs/doug/index.php/archives/2005/01/21/a-successor-to-mp3/
Jon Udell 1/21/05 Where was desktop search when we needed it? The network cloud is fast replacing traditional storage tools
http://www.infoworld.com//article/05/01/21/04OPstrategic_1.html
Many-to-Many 1/23/05 The Innovator's Lemma by Clay Shirky, To respond to David’s question about folksonomies Aren’t we going to innovate our way out of this? My answer is yes, but only for small values of “out.” A big part of what’s coming is accepting and adapting to the mess, instead of exiting it.
http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2005/01/23/the_innovators_lemma.php